User talk:AustralianRupert

‎Suggest KC holder RFC: new section

← Previous revision		Revision as of 00:06, 27 June 2016
Line 448:		Line 448:
	Information please on why this is being added to a number of talk pages. Thank you. [[User:Anthony Staunton|Anthony Staunton]] ([[User talk:Anthony Staunton|talk]]) 14:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)		Information please on why this is being added to a number of talk pages. Thank you. [[User:Anthony Staunton|Anthony Staunton]] ([[User talk:Anthony Staunton|talk]]) 14:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
	: {{tps}} Gday, it is one of a number of new MILHIST task forces that have recently been raised to co-ordinate work in this area, pls see here [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force]]. The other new ones are: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Military science, technology, and theory task force|Military science, technology, and theory]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Military logistics and medicine task force|Military logistics and medicine]]. The relevant discussion is [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history/Coordinators#Task_Force_Reorganization_Phase_II|here]]. [[User:Anotherclown|Anotherclown]] ([[User talk:Anotherclown|talk]]) 22:29, 26 June 2016 (UTC)		: {{tps}} Gday, it is one of a number of new MILHIST task forces that have recently been raised to co-ordinate work in this area, pls see here [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force]]. The other new ones are: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Military science, technology, and theory task force|Military science, technology, and theory]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Military logistics and medicine task force|Military logistics and medicine]]. The relevant discussion is [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history/Coordinators#Task_Force_Reorganization_Phase_II|here]]. [[User:Anotherclown|Anotherclown]] ([[User talk:Anotherclown|talk]]) 22:29, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Suggest KC holder RFC ==
		+
		+	Hi, thank you for the comment on the AfD discussion: {{tq|I think this raises an important question for the Milhist Project, though, so overall I would suggest we hold off on further nominations of these types of articles until an RFC can be held to discuss what level of the Knight's Cross is considered to be the "highest" award.}}
		+
		+	I agree that an RfC would be a good idea. What form would you envision it taking? [[User:K.e.coffman|K.e.coffman]] ([[User talk:K.e.coffman|talk]]) 00:06, 27 June 2016 (UTC)